Explain FX transaction vs. translation exposure.
A core Corporate Treasury interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.
THE SHORT ANSWER
Transaction: committed FX cash flows (AR in USD, AP in GBP) – hedged with forwards/options. Translation: FX impact on consolidating foreign sub financials – hedged with net investment hedges or FX debt matching. Transaction affects cash; translation affects reported equity.
WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR
- ✓Transaction exposure definition
- ✓Translation exposure definition
- ✓Hedging methods for each
- ✓Cash vs equity impact
COMMON MISTAKES
- ✗Confusing transaction with translation
- ✗Ignoring hedging instruments
- ✗Stating translation affects cash flows
Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.
Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.
RELATED QUESTIONS
- A company has a net investment hedge in a foreign subsidiary using a USD-denominated loan. The USD strengthens by 5% against the EUR. How is this hedge accounted for under IAS 21? What is the impact on equity?
- What is the difference between transaction exposure and translation exposure in FX risk management?
- A company has a USD functional currency and a EUR subsidiary. The subsidiary has a €100M loan from a bank. The EUR weakens by 10% against USD. How does this affect the group's reported net debt and leverage? Assume no hedge.
- What is a zero-cost collar in FX hedging?
- How would you design a layered (rolling) hedging program for recurring forecast FX exposures, and why layer rather than hedge spot-by-spot?
- Why centralize FX exposure management at group treasury, and how does exposure netting reduce hedging cost?