Answers / M&A Advisory

How do non-compete clauses work in German M&A?

A core M&A Advisory interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.

THE SHORT ANSWER

A seller (especially a founder or key shareholder) is bound by a post-closing non-compete so they can't immediately set up or join a competitor and take customers, staff, or know-how — destroying the goodwill the buyer just paid for. To be enforceable in Germany the restriction must be reasonable in scope: limited in duration (the BGH/courts generally accept up to about two years post-closing — longer is likely to be cut down or void), in geography, and in the activity/sector, and proportionate to protecting the legitimate interest acquired. An overbroad non-compete risks being unenforceable. It's reinforced with non-solicitation (of customers and employees) and confidentiality covenants, and often backed by contractual penalties (Vertragsstrafe) to make breach costly and provable. Without it, a founder could legally compete from day one and hollow out the acquired business, so it's a standard and important protection — but it must be drafted within the legal limits to actually hold.

WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR

  • Stops the seller competing/taking customers/staff post-close (protects goodwill)
  • Enforceable only if reasonable: ~2 years max, limited geography/scope (BGH limits)
  • Overbroad clauses risk being void/cut down
  • Reinforced by non-solicit, confidentiality, contractual penalties (Vertragsstrafe)

COMMON MISTAKES

  • Drafting an overbroad/indefinite non-compete (unenforceable)
  • Omitting non-solicit/confidentiality
  • Not knowing the ~2-year limit

Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.

Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.

TRY QUICKFIRE →Or train full M&A Advisory case simulations →

RELATED QUESTIONS