Answers / Financial Due Diligence
How does FDD differ from an audit?
A core Financial Due Diligence interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.
THE SHORT ANSWER
Purpose: audit verifies GAAP/IFRS compliance; FDD assesses economic performance. Scope: audit covers full year; FDD focuses on trailing 12–36 months. Output: audit gives an opinion; FDD gives a report with findings (no opinion). Client: audit serves shareholders; FDD serves the buyer or seller in an M&A transaction. Standard: audit follows ISA; FDD follows market practice.
WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR
- ✓Purpose: audit vs FDD
- ✓Scope: full year vs trailing months
- ✓Output: opinion vs report
- ✓Client: shareholders vs M&A parties
- ✓Standard: ISA vs market practice
COMMON MISTAKES
- ✗Confusing FDD with audit opinion
- ✗Thinking FDD covers full fiscal year
- ✗Believing FDD serves shareholders
You've seen the model answer. Now get graded on yours.
In the interview you won't have this page — you deliver your version on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.
RELATED QUESTIONS
- Why is FDD important in an M&A transaction?
- Walk me through a typical FDD engagement.
- What is the 'quality of net assets' and why is it important in FDD? Give an example of an issue you might uncover.
- How would you approach analyzing the EBITDA bridge of a target company with a complex business model, including multiple segments and significant one-time items? What specific line items would you focus on, and how would you defend your adjustments to the bridge?
- What is the primary purpose of a data request list in financial due diligence, and how would you prioritize the requests?
- Why must you reconcile management accounts to the audited statutory financials early in an FDD, and what do gaps tell you?