What are the key differences between a share deal and an asset deal in the context of German M&A, and how would you advise a client to choose between the two?
A core M&A Advisory interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.
THE SHORT ANSWER
In German M&A, a share deal involves the acquisition of the target company's shares, while an asset deal involves the acquisition of the target's assets. The key differences lie in the tax implications, liability assumptions, and regulatory requirements. I would advise the client to consider the target's tax profile, the level of liability associated with the assets, and the regulatory requirements applicable to the transaction when choosing between a share deal and an asset deal.
WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR
- ✓Tax implications
- ✓Liability assumptions
- ✓Regulatory requirements
COMMON MISTAKES
- ✗Failing to consider tax implications
- ✗Ignoring liability assumptions
Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.
Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.
RELATED QUESTIONS
- What is §613a BGB and why does it matter in German M&A?
- When is German merger control (Bundeskartellamt) approval needed, and what is the process?
- What is a Sozialplan and when is it required?
- Explain squeeze-out under German law.
- What is the French foreign-investment screening (IEF), and how does it work?
- What happens if works-council consultation is skipped in a German transaction?