Answers / Risk & Compliance

What is the Basel leverage ratio, and why is it needed alongside risk-weighted capital ratios?

A core Risk & Compliance interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.

THE SHORT ANSWER

The leverage ratio is a non-risk-based capital measure: Tier 1 capital divided by total exposure (on-balance-sheet assets plus off-balance-sheet exposures, derivatives, and SFTs, with limited netting), required above a minimum (3%, higher for global systemically important banks via a buffer). It deliberately ignores risk weights. It's needed alongside the risk-weighted ratios because RWAs depend on models and risk weights that can be gamed or simply wrong — a bank can pile into 'low-risk-weight' assets (sovereigns, certain mortgages) and look well-capitalized on a risk-weighted basis while being highly leveraged in absolute terms, as happened pre-2008. The leverage ratio is a simple, hard backstop: it caps total leverage regardless of how risky the assets are claimed to be, constrains model risk and RWA optimization, and is harder to manipulate. The two work together — the risk-weighted ratio for risk sensitivity, the leverage ratio as a non-risk floor — so neither can be defeated alone.

WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR

  • Tier 1 / total exposure (incl. off-balance-sheet), min 3% (+G-SIB buffer)
  • Non-risk-based — ignores risk weights deliberately
  • Backstops RWA gaming/model error (pre-2008 lesson)
  • Works with risk-weighted ratios as a simple hard floor

COMMON MISTAKES

  • Thinking it's risk-weighted
  • Not knowing why a non-risk backstop is needed
  • Ignoring off-balance-sheet exposure in the denominator

Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.

Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.

TRY QUICKFIRE →Or train full Risk & Compliance case simulations →

RELATED QUESTIONS