Answers / Valuation

How do you build a clean comparable set, and what adjustments make peers truly comparable?

A core Valuation interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.

THE SHORT ANSWER

Start by selecting peers on business comparability — same industry, business model, end-markets, growth and margin profile, size, and geography — not just the same broad sector. Then make the figures comparable: calendarize to a common fiscal year-end, use consistent definitions (same treatment of leases/IFRS 16, SBC, exceptionals across all peers), strip one-offs and normalize EBITDA the same way for each, and ensure the EV is built consistently (same debt-like items, minorities, associates handled identically). Exclude or flag outliers driven by special situations (M&A targets trading on bid speculation, distressed names, illiquid stocks). Present the spread (use the median, note the range) rather than a single peer. The discipline is twofold: the right companies, and the same accounting lens applied to all of them — because an inconsistently computed multiple set produces a confidently wrong answer.

WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR

  • Select on business model, end-markets, size, geography, margins/growth
  • Calendarize and apply consistent definitions across all peers
  • Normalize EBITDA and build EV the same way for each
  • Exclude special-situation outliers; present median and range

COMMON MISTAKES

  • Peers chosen on sector label alone
  • Inconsistent lease/SBC/exceptional treatment across the set
  • Including bid-affected or distressed outliers

Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.

Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.

TRY QUICKFIRE →Or train full Valuation case simulations →

RELATED QUESTIONS