Answers / Valuation

How do you treat an underfunded pension deficit in the EV-to-equity bridge, and what's the subtlety on tax?

A core Valuation interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.

THE SHORT ANSWER

An unfunded pension obligation is a debt-like claim: it's a future cash call that ranks ahead of shareholders, so I deduct the net deficit (obligation minus plan assets) in the bridge from EV to equity value, just like net debt. The subtlety is tax: pension contributions are usually tax-deductible, so the economic burden is the after-tax deficit — I apply the marginal tax rate and deduct the net-of-tax figure. I also check whether the deficit is already reflected in the cash flows (e.g., service cost in EBITDA) to avoid double-counting, and use the IAS 19 net liability rather than a stale actuarial number.

WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR

  • Pension deficit is debt-like — deduct in bridge
  • Use net deficit (obligation minus assets)
  • Adjust for tax-deductibility — after-tax figure
  • Avoid double-counting with service cost in EBITDA

COMMON MISTAKES

  • Ignoring pension deficit
  • Using gross deficit pre-tax
  • Double-counting service cost and the liability

Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.

Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.

TRY QUICKFIRE →Or train full Valuation case simulations →

RELATED QUESTIONS