How would you evaluate the reasonableness of management's going-concern assumptions when they rest on external factors like market trends or regulatory change?
An advanced Audit & Assurance question — expect it in final rounds and case-heavy interviews (IB, PE, Big-4 Transaction Services).
THE SHORT ANSWER
I'd anchor the work in ISA 570. First, obtain management's assessment covering at least 12 months from the reporting date and the cash-flow forecast behind it. Then challenge the external assumptions specifically: corroborate market/demand assumptions against independent data (analyst forecasts, industry reports, order book) rather than management assertion, and assess regulatory assumptions against the actual status of the rule/approval. Stress-test the forecast — flex the key drivers (revenue, margin, refinancing) and check headroom against covenants and liquidity in a downside. Examine the realism and reliability of prior forecasts (retrospective review for optimism bias), confirm committed financing, and obtain written representations. Finally, judge whether a material uncertainty exists and whether disclosure is adequate, which drives the opinion.
WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR
- ✓ISA 570: ≥12-month assessment + the cash-flow forecast behind it
- ✓Corroborate external assumptions with independent data, not assertion
- ✓Stress-test drivers vs covenant/liquidity headroom; retrospective review for bias
- ✓Confirm committed financing; conclude on material uncertainty + disclosure adequacy
COMMON MISTAKES
- ✗Accepting management's external assumptions at face value
- ✗No stress test or downside headroom analysis
- ✗Not linking the conclusion to disclosure/opinion
Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.
Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.
RELATED QUESTIONS
- Explain going concern assessment.
- Explain the difference between Emphasis of Matter and Other Matter.
- What do you do if a subsequent event changes the financial statements?
- A client has a significant but routine revenue stream and a smaller, highly complex revenue stream from new, bespoke contracts. Management's estimates for the bespoke contracts are subjective. Which of these, if any, is more likely to be a Key Audit Matter (KAM) and what factors would drive your decision?
- What is the difference between a qualified opinion and an adverse opinion?
- What is a Key Audit Matter (KAM) and how is it determined?